Tag Archives: VTP

Image from the Friends of CW Henry School

Why I Chose CW Henry: 2011-11-08 School Selection Report

Image from the Friends of CW Henry School

This is a snapshot of one parent’s school choice. You can read other parent testimonials and help other parents. Take five minutes to complete an anonymous survey to tell PSS and our readers about your school choice!

What school did you decide on? C.W. Henry

Calendar year your child entered/will enter 2011

Grade your child entered/will enter Kindergarten

What neighborhood are you in? NW Philly

What schools did you consider? Henry, Greene Street Friends, Germantown Friends, Wissahickon Charter, Russell Byers, Miquon

What factors were most important to you? Financial Aid Package, Reputation, Teaching Philosophy, Public Eduction, School Performance (test scores, success of graduates), Teacher Quality, Principal Quality, Diversity

What first attracted you to the school? Henry is a local school (although not our catchment school) with a good reputation and a strong network of families and alumni.  It is also a block away from Summit Children’s Program, which has an excellent aftercare program and a tremendous aftercare director.

What were the critical factors that led to your choice? Truthfully — in an ideal world I might have sent my child to Greene Street Friends, but they have a huge pre-K class and my child was waitlisted for kindergarten. But Please don’t disregard my support for Henry on that basis, because I bet I’m just being more candid than many people who post here.  The tuition also would have been a stretch, even though GSFS tuition is lower than other schools (I still would have had to pay for aftercare). BUT — when I looked at Henry, I saw kids who were just as happy and engaged as the kids I saw at each of the private schools I visited. And so I don’t really feel like I got my second choice, but a different choice.   I left my tour of Henry feeling strongly that the major difference between the private schools I’d looked at and Henry (aside from differences in educational approach at Miquon) was an aesthetic one.  If you send your child to an old Philadelphia school, even a good one, it’s not going to look like a cozy little Quaker school. It is not going to have a fireplace in the kindergarten classroom like GFS, or a creek like Miquon. It is not going to have the resources of GFS or Springside. But there are only 19 kids in each kindergarten classroom at Henry, a teacher and a student teacher, great diversity. The school is also one of a handful of schools that got a grant to bring in Playworks, a nationally recognized program that helps guide play at recess to help kids learn peacemaking and problem solving skills.  They have a garden.  They work with Weavers Way farm.  And they teach the kids to read in kindergarten.  Now, philosophically I might think my child doesn’t have to read in kindergarten.  They don’t teach kids to read in kindergarten at many private schools.  But four weeks into the first semester of kindergarten, it clicked for my kid, who is thrilled beyond belief at this new ability.  Who am I to frown at that? The kindergarten teacher is readily accessible by email, solves problems creatively (e.g., wanted to help channel my child’s enthusiasm and asked if it was ok to make my child a buddy for a child who was a little shy and needed a little help in class), and they’re learning great stuff in a class that includes children who are not necessarily exactly like them — class, race, ability, religion.  Other factors that might be worth considering: In public schools, if it turns out that your child needs learning support, you don’t have to pay for it (you do, extra, at private schools).  Henry is a feeder for Masterman (although over 80 percent of the kids who stay through grade 8 wind up at one of the magnet high schools, and when I toured the school the older kids seemed engaged and respectful, too.)  Also terrific music program, much better than what I saw at any private school with the possible exception of Germantown Friends, which gives every kid a violin for ten weeks in third grade.

Bottom line: happy, engaged child who loves learning, supportive school environment, and $10,000 that I’m not spending on school tuition.

Did you relocate in order to choose this school? No

On the political spectrum, I consider myself to be  liberal

Please share anything else about your experience We did not get into Henry through the voluntary transfer program.  However, we were connected to Henry because of our connection to Summit Children’s Program, which drops the kids off in the morning if you’ve got to get the early train and picks them up after school (and does art, yoga, free play, chess, all kinds of stuff with the kids).  There was a lot of direct begging of the principal at Henry.  They want involved parents.  I also went to the Considering Henry meetings.

I looked at two charter schools seriously: Wissahickon and Russell Byers.  I loved Wissahickon, even though I think that the charter schools are a drain on public education.I thought Wissahickon had a really special approach and I might have chosen it over Henry, although the neighborhood school/ Summit connection was a big seller.  If you’re considering Russell Byers over Henry or Jenks, I don’t think it’s got anything to offer that they don’t (and at least in the case of Henry, there’s no comparison with the music and art).

This is a snapshot of one parent’s school choice. You can read other parent testimonials and help other parents. Take five minutes to complete an anonymous survey to tell PSS and our readers about your school choice!

love_park_philadelphia

School Choice in Philadelphia: Myth to Reality

It bothers me when folks complain about a problem without offering a solution, or at least a direction for a solution. Back in August, I was guilty. I wrote “School Choice in Philadelphia is a Myth” Well, how could we turn the myth into reality?

To make amends, I have a two-pronged approach that doesn’t call for making every school a charter. The two prongs

  1. Rate schools
  2. Give transfer/charter opportunities to parents living in catchments with poorly rated schools

How should we go about rating schools? I propose a weighted three-tiered rating system. All of these evaluation criteria would be completely transparent–with results viewable by families, school and public officials. A school rating would be composed of the following:

Tier 1: Test Scores (20%): if you have spent any time reading this blog, you know that I think that reliance on test scores is a bad idea.  Reliance on test scores alone gives schools incentive to cheat. And apparently some do.  Plus, the tests themselves explain income levels better than they explain whether a school is well run or has good teachers. On the other hand, the School District of Philadelphia already has an answer to this problem–a comparison of test scores with schools in peer neighborhoods called the School Performance Index. This does not eliminate the problem of cheating or economic bias, but the relatively low weighting compared to the other criteria should balance that.

Tier 2: Independent Evaluation (40%): I propose creating an Educational Quality Assessment team. This commission would be an independent group of experienced educators formed or hired by the city/state to evaluate schools. The educators would conduct random audits of schools. Their team would visit classrooms, interview principals and teachers, review curriculur materials, and whatever else they deemed necessary to determine the quality of a school and its teachers and administrators.

Tier 3: Parent Satisfaction (40%): Let parents take tests too!  On an annual/bi-annual basis, parents would rate their school. Is the school responsive to parent concerns? Have their kids developed adequately in the past year? How does the school perform in areas of academics, discipline, extracurricular programs, special needs programs, etc.?

Which brings me to the second prong of my approach.  Today parents can enter two sets of lotteries which, like the traditional lottery, offer slim prospects of ‘winning’ a seat.  The chances of gaining a seat at a charter school are about 10-15% per school, depending on the school.  The Voluntary Transfer Program (VTP) is the same–In fact, VTP is a pipe dream for many parents.  Though I have heard that it happens, I have personally never met a parent who got awarded a seat this way.  Many school officials that I have spoken with have stated that in most years they accept ZERO transfers.

I propose, simply, that families’ VTP and charter school applications be weighted by the previously calculated rating of their catchment school. Families at the worst schools should get a much greater set of alternatives than families who come from neighborhoods serviced by strong schools. Families who already have good school options would be strongly encouraged to stay at their neighborhood school, increasing neighborhood cohesiveness.  The VTP and charter school systems do not have the capacity to create a mass migration from the poorly performing schools–maybe the small migration can be used to alleviate overcrowding and actually help the poorly performing schools improve?

What do you think of this idea?  Feasibility aside, am I a complete lunatic?  Would this idea work?

wissahickonchartermap

Why I Chose Wissahickon Charter: 2011-10-13 School Selection Report

This is a snapshot of one parent’€™s school choice. You can read other parent testimonials and help other parents. Take five minutes to complete an anonymous survey to tell PSS and our readers about your school choice!

What school did you decide on? Wissahickon Charter School

Calendar year your child entered 2011

Grade your child entered Kindergarten

What neighborhood are you in? NW Philly

What schools did you consider? Applied:

Cook-Wissahickon

Henry

Green Woods

Wissahickon Charter School

Independence

Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School

Miquon

Green Street Friends

Plymouth Meeting Friends School

 

Accepted:

Plymouth Meeting Friends School

St. Bridget

Philadelphia Performing Arts Charter School (from the waitlist – no # given)

Wissahickon Charter School (from the waitlist – #6)

What factors were most important to you? Tuition, Location, Financial Aid Package, Teaching Philosophy, Public Eduction, Teacher Quality, Principal Quality, Diversity, Special Programs (language immersion, music, etc.)

What first attracted you to the school? Appreciation for the environmental focus of the school.  (In the end, many other things make me happy with our decision…some of which are highlighted on their website, and in other parents’ choice questionnaires.)

What were the critical factors that led to your choice? Feeling of a right fit, finances, location.

Did you relocate in order to choose this school? No

On the political spectrum, I consider myself to be  open-minded

Please share anything else about your experience This was such a long and drawn out process.  We loved many of the schools we visited and applied to.  We enrolled in the neighborhood Catholic school in May, when we determined that that it would be irresponsible in our current situation to try and make even aid supported tuition at PMFS.  At the end of June, we were accepted off the waitlist a PPACS, and then at the end of July, at Wissahickon Charter School.  While the idea of the arts enriched curriculum at PPACS was a strong draw, the location and logistics did not work for us.  We are, so far, very pleased with our final decision, and….so glad the process is over.

This is a snapshot of one parent’€™s school choice. You can read other parent testimonials and help other parents. Take five minutes to complete an anonymous survey to tell PSS and our readers about your school choice!

lottery

Voluntary Transfer Process is Broken

In an article on her blog, Miriam Hill of the Philadelphia Inquirer writes that despite the official rules dictating that the School District of Philadelphia’s  Volunteer Transfer Program (VTP) works like a lottery, the process itself is somewhat arbitrary and haphazard, putting the power to accept students in the hands of individual schools.  The result, of course, is that the families who most need the process are the least likely to be able to benefit from it.  Not really a surprise, but certainly a shame.  Of course, the most traditionally desirable schools rarely, if ever, accept VTP students, so the problem is not impacting too many folks.  If you are thinking about applying to VTP, be sure to read our guide and if nothing else, cast a wide net.

schoolsign

Voluntary Transfer Program for 2012-2013

Well, it’s that time of year again. School has started for most, but some are trying to figure out where to send their kids next year. Yes, it’s once again time again for the Voluntary Transfer Program (VTP)! For Philadelphia residents, VTP allows families to apply for seats in public schools outside of their designated catchment.  Applications are accepted starting on September 19 and you want to be early if you can.  Last year I published a post that served as a primer on transfers, but it was so popular (and now outdated) that I decided to revise it for 2012-2013 and post it as a page, making it easier for parents to find. You can find it under the “Start Here” menu at the top of the page or get there directly from here.

Incidentally, West Philly families considering Lea Elementary should check out advice about VTP and lots of information specific to Lea VTP on the West Philly Coalition for Neighborhood Schools website.